ABCs for Life Success

ABCs for Life Success
Education Experts Committed to Extraordinary Service to Families and Educators

Search This Blog

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Burden of Proof-3 Reasons to shift it and 3 things you can do for children

Why do I support shifting the burden of proof in IDEA hearings to schools?
My Top 3 reasons:
1. Schools write the IEP, schools determine placements, schools are full of experts, schools have resources, schools hold the records, schools control information.
2. Parents cannot stop the School's actions in the IEP meeting. Parents must request a hearing to stop an inappropriate placement.
3. Parents do not know how to effectively navigate a due process hearing, and must pay attorneys and experts. Parents should not have to compromise the child's education because they cannot afford a hearing.

Here's a great COPAA article on the topic-

WHAT can YOU do? Top 3 actions:
1. Sign this petition.

2. Testify.
In writing or in person!
Link to bills-
3. Call and write your representative!

Dear Delegate __________:

I am writing to ask you to support HB 1286 and SB 691. HB 1286 / SB 691 would place the burden of proof on school districts in special education due process hearings under the IDEA. Burden of proof on school districts has the support of many individuals and organizations, including the Maryland PTAs and MCCPTA.

I am asking you to support this bill because fairness dictates that school districts, not parents, carry the burden of proof in due process. As it is, parents of children with disabilities are working harder than most parents will ever know to meet their children’s special needs. Add to this the fact that these same parents are routinely outnumbered, overwhelmed, and outspent by school districts that write the IEPs, control the educational records, and employ the witnesses they call. Thus, asking parents to bear the burden of proof through an unfamiliar legal process, when many parents cannot afford an attorney, against an entire school district is too much and unfair.

I realize HB 1161 has been introduced to set up a commission to study special education access and equity in Maryland. While such a commission may prove valuable in different ways, I am concerned that the opportunity to address the inequities of burden of proof on parents will be missed, and parents will continue to bear this unfair burden. Parents cannot wait for a study to finally have burden of proof placed on the school districts - after eight years of bearing this burden, we know it’s too much and unfair. This proposed commission is not a substitute for acting now on burden of proof and putting it where it belongs, on the school districts.

Thank you for your support.

Very truly yours,


ADDRESS (street, city, state, zip)

P.S. If you want to send an old-fashioned envelope-and-stamp letter:
--go here:
--This gives you a list of all Maryland legislators.
--Click on a legislator's name to see his/her real-world mailing address.

If you don't know what district you live in:

· go to ("Maryland State Archives: Who Are Your Elected Officials")

· type in your street address

· click "find"

· Voila--a list of your Annapolis senator & delegates--AND it tells you what your district number is for Maryland! (Also includes your Washington DC senator & representative, your Congressional district #, and your state governor & other top officials.)

This bill is in the House the Ways and Means Committee - Please Email These Members As Well As Your Delegates - We Want This Bill to Go to Floor for a Full Vote!

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Don't Let RtI delay Services

Let RtI work for your child, but don't let it delay services or evaluation. 

What is RtI?
Response to Intervention is the name of an evidence based process for solving and addressing acadmic or behavior problems in students of all ages. The basic idea is to

School Success for Kids with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders


DOWNLOAD as PDF from Prufrock Press

Provide an intervention with fidelity
Collect data and monitor progress
Determine if changes should be made

Make the changes

FLORIDA guidance on the use of RtI


MARYLAND guidance on the use of RtI

I started off giving you these two links to two of my favorite state's guidances on the use of RtI, Response to Intervention.

Here are some 'red flag' phrases you may hear in a multidisciplinary team meeting that may show you that you need to use your advocacy skills and knowledge to inquire further:

What you may hear: 
"We are still under RTI for your child, so we can't do an evaluation".
Your response: 
Write a letter formally requesting an evaluation in all areas of suspected or known disability.

RtI is used to put interventions in place. RtI always involves a full team and parents.  Data monitors progress. 

Don't let the use of RtI delay the evaluation or identification of your child's educational disability.

Contact us today if you need a free consultation.  Don't go to another IEP meeting without understanding your and your child's basic rights.

Contact an expert today!

When do you need an advocate?

This informative article can help parents and educators work together in child-centered partnerships. Even during and after disputes.
"Break in Communication" from NAGC's Parenting for High Potential.

Contact me today for a free #specialed consultation.